start your own blog now!
 
Read other blogs...
[Liverpool Liberal Party]
>News, Views and Reports from the Liberal Party in Liverpool...<
 


Tuesday, July 25, 2006

House Crusher Programme and Local Election Results : Published in North West Enquirer

Where the Pathfinder programme is losing its way 

Firstly,  may we thank The Enquirer for an excellent review (May 4) on the controversial Pathfinder Demolition debate.

In Merseyside the extent of demolition as compared to renovation has led to an extensive resident resistance.

This has vented itself in the political process by the way four of the city’s leading anti-demolition campaigners were sponsored by the Liberal Party: Mike Butler in Anfield, Nine Edge in Princes Park, Griff Parry in Picton and Elizabeth Pascoe in Kensington and Fairfield Ward .

Across the city Liberal Party candidates had the slogan STOP DEMOLISHING – START RENOVATING placed on the ballot paper alongside their party name.

Whilst the demolition campaigners did not win any seats they all obtained significant votes.

The total impact in the city wide vote when all 30 wards are totalled was:

The Lib Democrat vote collapsed from 56 per cent to 40.5 per cent;

The Labour Party gained three seats and raised their vote by 6 per cent to 38 per cent;

The Conservative Party fielded more candidates than for a decade, however their vote rose from three  per cent to 6.7 per cent.

Interestingly, the new-look image didn’t permeate to Liverpool.

In several wards the Tories had to appeal to sectarian divisions and candidates stood as Conservative and Unionist as the only way to obtain 10 nominators.

The Greens benefited from the defection of a Lib Dem Councillor 48 hours before polling. They obtained 5.9 per cent of the vote and profiled an anti-demolition stand.

We in the opposition Liberal Party saw our city wide vote rise from six per cent to 7.5 per cent and remain a clear third party in the city.

We believe the Pathfinder Programme should be more appropriately described as the “House Crusher Programme.”

As the next 5,000 CPOs and demolitions are carried out and another 5,000 families are added to the city’s record waiting lists, we are confident the resident’s opposition will intensify.

Unless the Lib Dems change direction they will loose control within the next two years.

Councillors Steve Radford, Hazel Williams and Chris Lenton,
Liberal Party members Liverpool City Council
 

author: Steve | 07/25/06 04:50 | comments

Newsham Park dd not want Red Light Signposts

* THE recent removal of the kerb crawler signs from lampposts on Sheil Road is welcome news as the only impact this signage had was to present the Newsham Park area as a red light district.
 
The Liberal Group has lobbied the chief executive of the council at least twice to request that these signs be removed due to their impact on the area and because no proper consultation ever took place with local residents or any of the councillors for the Tuebrook ward.
 
Cllrs Steve Radford, Hazel Williams & Chris Lenton,
Tuebrook & Stoneycroft Liberal Party

author: Steve | 07/25/06 04:01 | comments

Homes reprieved as mass demolition plans frozen

Jul 20 2006

By Larry Neild, Daily Post

 

 

The future of hundreds of terraced houses in the city's Anfield area is still uncertain

 

LIVERPOOL'S plans to bulldoze 3,000 terraced houses as part of the biggest clearance programme for 40 years, lay in tatters last night, jubilant critics claimed.

They say a decision by Local Government Secretary of State Ruth Kelly to freeze plans for a massive regeneration programme, would spell the end of the strategy.

But council officials insisted that the plans for Anfield, Breckfield, Edge Hill and Picton areas of the city, have not been shelved.

They say the minister has called for more information about the plans before deciding whether there should be a public inquiry.

 

In the meanwhile, the minister has issued a formal notice to the council banning them from granting any planning approvals without authorisation from the Government.

 

The Government move comes as a public inquiry into compulsory purchase orders for around 1,000 homes in the four areas continues.

 

Objectors to the CPO orders were last night considering whether they should call for the public inquiry to be halted pending a definitive decision from the minister about the so-called Pathways regeneration strategy in Liverpool.

 

Liberal councillor Steve Radford said last night: "We are delighted the Government is seeing the mismanagement by the council for what it is.

 

"This has all been about fast-tracking demolition of thousands of houses, rather than about the future of these areas.

 

"This illustrates the sheer shallowness of the council's vision. We as a party have been objectors to this wholesale massacre of our communities since day one. We thought the days of bulldozing our communities had been dispatched to the history books.

 

"Our contention is that Liverpool City Council has a policy of de-populating certain areas of the city and in total 12,000 terraced houses are at risk. We hope that this stop order will expose the strategy for what is."

In the meanwhile, the minister has issued a formal notice to the council banning them from granting any planning approvals without authorisation from the Government.

 

The Government move comes as a public inquiry into compulsory purchase orders for around 1,000 homes in the four areas continues.

 

Objectors to the CPO orders were last night considering whether they should call for the public inquiry to be halted pending a definitive decision from the minister about the so-called Pathways regeneration strategy in Liverpool.

 

Liberal councillor Steve Radford said last night: "We are delighted the Government is seeing the mismanagement by the council for what it is.

 

"This has all been about fast-tracking demolition of thousands of houses, rather than about the future of these areas.

 

"This illustrates the sheer shallowness of the council's vision. We as a party have been objectors to this wholesale massacre of our communities since day one. We thought the days of bulldozing our communities had been dispatched to the history books.

 

"Our contention is that Liverpool City Council has a policy of de-populating certain areas of the city and in total 12,000 terraced houses are at risk. We hope that this stop order will expose the strategy for what it is."


author: Steve | 07/25/06 03:52 | comments

 
 

 

Village Green Status Bid to Protect Clubmoor Rec

ON July 17, leading members of the Caucus residents' association, along with Liberal Party leader Cllr Steve Radford, lodged a formal application at both Liverpool magistrates court,and city council to have Clubmoor Rec awarded village green status.

The city council will now be obliged to publish a notice, which includes a statutory period for objections.

Pat and Georgina have been determined to stop the ongoing encroachment of the recreation ground, which has occurred under both Labour and Lib Dem councils.

Pat has lived in the area for 60 years and is very nervous of the way the council has abandoned Stanley Park.

By obtaining village green status, residents can deter further encroachment on to this beautiful green open space from developers and land grabbers.

author: Steve | 07/25/06 03:43 | comments

Monday, July 17, 2006

Cllrs Steve Radford, Hazel Williams and Chris Lenton
Liberal Party Group
41 Sutton Street
Tuebrook
Liverpool
L13 7EG
 
0152 259 5935
 
07920090322
 
Dear Editor
 
During the current Public Inquiry concerning the initial demolition of 1,100 terraced properties in Anfield, Wavertree and Edge Hill the council has clarified that they are not demolishing houses because the houses are unfit. In fact two thirds of the homes are structually secure in this initail wave of demolition.
 
Many of the homes are currently empty only because the city council ,in collaberation with the housing associations ,have been emptying them out over many years,.
We believe this policy of neglect by stealth should have been subject to proper public debate, not discussed by the housing committee behind closed doors.
 
Even more alarming is that the council consultant and advocate of this policy has stated that "household projections lead to the estimation of 209,000 households in Liverpool in 2016. At present there are 199,000 households - an oversupply of 11,000 ., However there are 15,500 new homes which enjoy planning permission...which will increase the oversupply to 16,500 homes."
 
The council are spending millions of pounds purchasing terraced homes only to demolish them and then hand the land site over to one of four national house builders
 
Fourteen times the amount of public money is being spent to progress demolition as compared to spending on improving current houses
 
Unless there is a major rethink of Council and Government policy then every community of terraced houses should feel under threat.
 
The demolition coalition of Labour and Lib Democrats have contempt for the right of people to live in their own homes unmolested by state compulsory purchase.
 
With their current logic of removing terraced properties deemded to be surplus ,anything between 10,000 and 15,000 more terraced homes could be CPO'd on top of the current schedule
 
We urge readers to protest at this destructive policy before even more damage and dereliction is rolled out as part of a deliberate public policy to redesign the city
 
Cllrs Steve Radford, Hazel Williams and Chris Lenton
Liberal Party Group

author: Steve | 07/17/06 04:29 | comments

Monday, July 03, 2006

 

 


Day of destiny for old streets

Jun 14 2006

By Nick Coligan Political Reporter, Liverpool Echo

 

THREE of Liverpool's oldest communities face D-day at a crucial meeting to decide the fate of thousands of terraced homes.

Councillors will tour Anfield, Edge Hill and Waver-tree tomorrow, before the future of dozens of Victorian streets is decided.

The three separate schemes are all part of regeneration company New Heartlands' multi-million pound vision for Merseyside's housing.

If given the go-ahead, they will mean:

* The demolition of 1,800 homes around Anfield stadium, to be replaced with 1,300 homes, shops, offices and community facilities.

 


 

* The bulldozing of 640 properties to the south of Edge Lane, Edge Hill, where about 300 new homes and shops will be built.

 

* The replacement of 525 terraces off Smithdown Road and Earle Road, Wavertree, with up to 450 new two- and three-storey homes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Housing experts say the three communities have come to the end of their useful lives and need to be replaced with modern homes to get the property market back on its feet.

Many residents are happy to leave with the promise of being helped into a new property in the near future.

But others are campaigning to stay and have the terraces refurbished to 21st-century standards instead.

Liverpool council's planning committee will have the final say.

Liberal councillor Steve Radford, who opposes demolition, said: "These plans will simply add to the city's housing problems by deliberately making areas derelict.

"Organ-isations like English Heritage have real concerns about the quality of new housing."

 

Councillors are also set to give the go-ahead to plans for more than 70 homes on the former site of St Thomas a Becket school, off Spekeland Road, Edge Hill.

I want to go NOW

KAREN Williams is ready to move out of her Anfield home as soon as she gets the green light.

She rents her two-bedroom terrace in Vienna Street from a housing association and is waiting for another one to become available in a different area before leaving.

Karen, who has a seven-year-old son, Joseph, said: "My house definitely needs work doing on it - the bathroom has got damp, for example.

"I am happy to go and not come back, but Iwould like ahouse with a garden this time.

"This is not a very pleasant area to live in now, because kids keep getting into empty houses and setting fires."

 

Leave our community alone

 

MAXINE Liu has lived off Smithdown Road for more than 30 years - and she has no intention of going anywhere yet.

 

Maxine, of Tunstall Street, Wavertree, is a member of Smithdown Against Demolition, a new group set up to fight demolition plans.

 

She said: "First and fore-most, it will break up the community. People around here are always there if you need them.

 

"We are told we can move back into the area where we were born and bred, but we are worried that we will not be able to afford it. New properties are often expensive, especially for first-time buyers. A lot of people would benefit more if properties were modernised."

author: Steve | 07/03/06 16:13 | comments

City pleads for housing dowry

Jun 8 2006

By Nick Coligan Political Reporter,Liverpool Echo

 

 

Cllr Steve Radford at one of the empty houses

 

HOUSING officials need £135m from the government before 20,000 council homes can be transferred to a new landlord.

Without it, the entire transfer, which will lead to millions of pound of improvements to council houses, could fail.

Liverpool council will start talks with ministers tomorrow in the hope of getting hold of the money within the next few weeks.

Council officials today said they were confident they would get the money and hand over all their properties to new housing association Liverpool Mutual Homes (LMH).

 

But some councillors fear ministers will be put off by a series of problems blighting LMH.

 

Wavertree Labour MP Jane Kennedy has asked the government to investigate the recent walk-out of three senior managers.

 

The council will pay the £135m to LMH as a "dowry" so it can start paying for improvements suchas new kitchens, windows and central heating. LMH will then borrow the rest of the money it needs to bring homes up to 21st century standards.

Without the dowry, LMH might struggle to obtain the other money because the standard of Liverpool's council housing is so poor and low-value.

Housing officer Rob Farnos said: "The government has a pot of money for councils in our position, so we can give a dowry to the new landlord.

"We need that money to make the transfer happen. If it does not stack up financially, there is no point proceeding. These are crucial talks.

"The government obviously wants it to work, but wants to make sure it is happy with all the arrangements.

"We have asked for the amount that we think we need."

But Cllr Steve Munby, Labour opposition spokesman on regeneration, said the government "will need convincing" that the handover is going smoothly.

 

"LMH is still at an early stage, but clearly things are going wrong if senior staff are packing their bags.

 

"The government is prepared to put huge amounts of money into Liverpool's housing, but will want to hear astrong case before agreeing to this much."

 

Liberal Cllr Steve Radford added: "This money is desperately needed so a deal can be offered to tenants that they feel secure about."

 

Council tenants will vote in September whether they want the handover to happen.

 
 

 Next

 

 

author: Steve | 07/03/06 16:02 | comments

 


The last Anfield battle

Jun 7 2006

Daily Post

 

 

Latest artist's impression of the new Anfield Stadium on Stanley Park

 

CAMPAIGNERS fighting against Liverpool FC's plans to build a new stadium at Stanley Park have got one final chance to formally object.

More than 10,000 leaflets are being handed out across the city by Liberal councillors warning residents about potential traffic chaos that could be caused by the new ground.

They claim residents' parking schemes and park and ride schemes have not been drawn up to cope with the extra match day traffic.

The flyers also question why the city council has refused to say how much the land being gifted to a new joint venture company involving the city council and the club is worth.

 

The plan to dispose of the land needed for the ground was "called in" by the environment scrutiny panel and objections must now be sent to the council by June 20.

 

Liberal Party leader Cllr Steve Radford said: "We are sending out 10,000 leaflets and want people to fill in the forms and send them to the council before it is too late."

 

The Stanley Park plans have proved contentious because the stadium will take up part of the green space occupied by the Victorian park.

 

But work has still not started on the stadium amid rumours the club is struggling to raise the money to pay for what has now become a £190m project.

author: Steve | 07/03/06 15:55 | comments